NEWS Summary
Fair Deal for Small Investors
The Globe and Mail in an editorial entitled "OSC is thinking
small" on Friday, April 5, 2002, states "We applaud the Ontario
Securities Commission's new "fair dealing model" proposals aimed
at improving information and safeguards for small retail investors. They
could form the basis for a much-needed revamping of the framework for
dealer-client dealings and could reverse a disturbing erosion of
protections for small investors."
The editors also write "The plan recommends, among other things,
increased transparency of dealer compensation and conflicts of interest;
... and making firms more accountable for improper dealings by their
employees. It also calls for a "fair dealing agreement"... which
"would replace the current 'know your client' form, ... but
"would go further than the know-your-client form in giving both
parties vital information in understanding their obligations to one
another. Further, it would require such disclosure from all service
providers, whether they be traditional brokerage firms, discount brokers
or RRSP providers. It's a rational, evenhanded treatment that will provide
protection to all levels of investors."
SIPA says - Remarks entitled
"A Fair Dealing Model" by David A. Brown, Chair,
Ontario Securities Commission, to The Investment Funds Institute of
Canada Kick-Off Breakfast create a feeling of optimism for small
investors. His remarks follow initiatives by both the Manitoba Securities
Commission and the British Columbia Securities Commission regarding
industry de-regulation and improved protection for small investors.
Brown's remarks deal with the new reality of the
investing world and calls for changes that could provide help for the
small investor, particularly if they hold the firms responsible for the
representatives actions and provide a power to orer restitution to small
investors.
Richard Blackwell's article "OSC plans major changes to broker
supervision" in the Globe and Mail on Wednesday, April 3, 2002, says
"The Ontario Securities Commission plans dramatic changes to the way
it supervises brokers and other investment professionals, so investors
will know exactly how much their advisers earn from selling investment
products. The changes will also see the elimination of the current
"know-your-client" form filled out by brokers, and its
replacement with a document that defines the customer's objectives more
clearly."
Richard also writes that "OSC chairman David Brown outlined what
he called a 'fair dealing model' in a speech in
Toronto (to The Investment Funds Institute of Canada) yesterday, marking
the opening of Investor Education Month. ... Mr. Brown said investing
clients clearly need to know more about the costs of products they buy.
While discount brokerage commissions are very clear, and mutual fund fees
are becoming more transparent, full-service brokerage commissions and the
spreads on debt securities are not well understood, he said. Data are
often inadequate at the point of sale, he said, which is where 'the
consumer needs the information to determine if the provider has any
potential conflicts of interest.' "
Richard also writes "In addition to reforming the investor-client
relationship, Mr. Brown said the advisory group is looking at enforcement
issues. Of particular interest is the notion that brokerages lack
sufficient incentive to keep a proper watch on top-performing employees.
In the future, companies may be subject to enforcement action if they
don't investigate suspicious activities, including "high production
levels," he said. Other changes might force companies to assume
liability for client losses if bad advice is provided on a systematic
basis."
SIPA says - Mr. Brown's remarks are welcome news for small
investors. Recently the Manitoba Securities Commission and the British
Columbia Securities Commission have also been talking about revisions to
regulations and improved protection for small investors.
The industry must realize that it can not continue to ride roughshod
over small investors and survive long term. There have been some recent
moves to reduce brokerage responsibility towards small investors by
relaxing requirements for discount brokerage firms to supervise accounts
for suitability. This is not acceptable unless it is counterbalanced with
a requirement that these discount brokerages ensure investors know the new
rules and the risks associated with investing in that type of environment.
If the regulators follow through and do make the firms accountable for
the actions of their representatives and are able to order restitution it
will help to clean up the industry so that in future small investors will
not be faced with the almost insurmountable task of trying to gain
restitution when their "trusted broker" has breached all of the
rules that are meant to protect investors.
|